4.5 Article

Enhancement of anaerobic co-digestion performance at the high organic load by application of waste seashell: the synergistic impacts of alkaline additive

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03590-x

关键词

Co-substrates; Anaerobic co-digestion; Waste seashell; High organic load; Inhibitory agents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of waste seashell as an alkaline additive significantly enhances the performance of anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge, reducing inhibitory levels of volatile fatty acids and ammonia and increasing methane production yield.
This study aims to enhance the performance of a low-buffered anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge using an alkaline-based additive (waste seashell). Eighteen lab-scaled reactors were performed to evaluate the synergistic effects of waste seashell on methane production at different organic load. The addition of waste seashell showed significant synergistic effects with organic load on the anaerobic co-digestion performance in reducing the inhibitory level of volatile fatty acids and ammonia by (i) increasing buffer capacity of the systems, (ii) providing various slats, and (iii) changing the methanogenic pathway for achieving higher methane production yield. The addition of waste seashell with the concentration of 8 g/L, 20 g/L, and 26 g/L declined the propionic accumulation by 55%, 54%, and 49%, respectively, compared to their peer reactor at the same organic load. The utilization of waste seashell at 26 g/L increased the methane yield up to 219 mLCH(4)/gVS at an organic load of 15.6 gVS/L, represented 6.44, and 7.8-times higher methane yield and organic load increment, respectively, than that of conventional anaerobic co-digestion. However, at further increase of waste seashell and organic load, the anaerobic co-digestion showed low methane generation of 89.3 mL CH4/gVS due to the inhibitory impacts of calcium concentration on the biological process. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据