4.7 Article

Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation algorithm for parameter identification of solid oxide fuel cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 12, 页码 17903-17923

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.6929

关键词

artificial neural network; Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation; optimization methods; parameter identification; estimation; solid oxide fuel cell

资金

  1. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [52037003]
  2. Major Special Project of Yunnan Province of China [202002AF080001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61963020, 51907112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A parameter identification technique based on the LMBP algorithm is proposed in this study, which is validated through two typical models to show its performance under different operation conditions. Simulation results demonstrate that the LMBP algorithm significantly improves accuracy, speed, and stability compared to other mainstream meta-heuristic algorithms.
Fast and precise identification of several unknown parameters for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) models play a critical role in modeling analysis, optimal control, and behavior prediction. However, inherent high-nonlinear, multi-variable, and strongly coupled features usually lead to thorny obstacles that hinder conventional methods to identify them with a high speed, high accuracy, and reliable stability. Hence, a Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation (LMBP) algorithm-based parameter identification technique is proposed in this study, which is applied to efficiently train designed artificial neural networks (ANNs) to implement the identification task. Furthermore, two typical models, for example, electrochemical model (ECM) and steady-state model (SSM), are taken into account to validate the identification performance of the LMBP algorithm under different operation conditions. Simulation results based on MATLAB demonstrate that the LMBP algorithm can extremely improve the accuracy, speed, and stability for estimating these unknown parameters via a comprehensive comparison with four mainstream meta-heuristic algorithms, that is, artificial ecosystem-based optimization (AEO), equilibrium optimizer (EO), grey wolf optimization (GWO), and moth-flame optimization (MFO).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据