4.7 Article

Coupling a metal hydride tank with a PEMFC for vehicular applications: A simulations framework

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 11, 页码 16511-16523

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.6898

关键词

hydrogen tank; metal hydride; PEMFC; thermal management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a thermal coupling topology of a PEMFC with a metal hydride tank for vehicular applications. The heat generated by the PEMFC is reused to extract usable hydrogen for PEMFC, and two heat exchangers are integrated into the system to regulate temperature and pressure effectively. The proposed controller in the simulations achieves the objectives of maintaining temperature and pressure for reliable operation.
This paper presents a thermal coupling topology of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) with a metal hydride tank (MHT) based on FeTi metal hydride (MH) for vehicular applications. Usually, the heat produced by the PEMFC is evacuated to the ambient and MHT is heated by an external heat source, which negatively affects the efficiency of the PEMFC system as a whole. The idea is to reuse the heat generated by the PEMFC and re-inject it into the MHT to extract the usable hydrogen (H-2) for PEMFC. Initially, a comprehensive model of a multiphysics system to manage the exchange of energy flux among the PEMFC and MHT is developed. Subsequently, two distinctive heat exchangers are integrated into the multiphysics system. The performance of the overall system depends on the effective regulation of both temperature and pressure associated with introduced exchanges. For that, two parallel controllers are devised to simultaneously regulate the H-2 pressure and temperature of the PEMFC stack. The simulations of the system are established on MATLAB/Simulink software. It is shown by the simulation results that the proposed controller achieves the two requested objectives: maintaining the temperature and pressure of both the PEMFC stack and MHT for reliable operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据