4.7 Review

Hotspots, frontiers, and emerging trends of tandem solar cell research: A comprehensive review

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 104-123

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1002/er.7074

关键词

efficiency; nonfullerene; organic solar cell; perovskite; silicon; tandem solar cell

资金

  1. Department of Education, Fujian Province [JZ190068]
  2. Huaqiao University [20JF-JXGZ01, 50X17191]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972123, U1705256]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reviewing the literature on tandem solar cell (TSC) research from 2000 to 2019, identifying the top 10 research hotspots and clusters, and revealing the development orientation of TSC research. The study indicates that organic solar cells are the mainstream of TSC research, while perovskite solar cells are a typical emerging trend.
A tandem solar cell (TSC) is a kind of special photovoltaic (PV) device with two or further sub-cells stacked in it. On the basis of Web of Science database and CiteSpace software, the literature about TSC research from 2000 to 2019 is reviewed. The top 10 hotspots are deduced (efficiency, performance, film, silicon, design, open circuit voltage, polymer, morphology, oxide, and growth), yielding prominence of the primary roles of devices and materials in PV research. The top 10 research clusters are analyzed (organic compounds, polymer solar cells, perovskite, non-fullerene acceptors, silicon, high frequency-glow discharge, solution process, light trapping, liquid phase epitaxy, and water splitting), revealing the development orientation of TSC research. High co-citation, strong burst citation, and representative frontier literature are highlighted. Five evolution trends/clusters are examined. Organic solar cells are the mainstream of TSC research and are gradually replaced by the emerging trend of non-fullerenes. Perovskite solar cells are a typical emerging trend, which rejuvenates the traditional silicon solar cells. This review provides a visual panorama of TSC research over the past two decades.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据