4.6 Article

Multi-objective optimal operation of pumped-hydro-solar hybrid system considering effective load carrying capability using improved NBI method

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106802

关键词

Hybrid renewable energy system; Optimal operation; Effective load carrying capability; Normal boundary intersection; Linearization

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB0905200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper focuses on the optimal operation of a hybrid renewable energy system, proposing a multi-objective optimization model to address the reliability and economy issues. The improved NBI method and linearization transformation techniques were employed for optimization, with case study results demonstrating the feasibility of the model and the effectiveness of the improved method, highlighting the importance of ELCC in HRES operation.
Hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) is an effective approach to aggregate multiple renewables efficiently. This paper focuses on the optimal operation of a hybrid system consisting of pumped hydro storage, cascade hydropower station, run-of-river hydropower station and photovoltaic plant. Various elements and contradictory aims like reliability and economy makes the operation of HRES complex. With this regard, a multi-objective optimization model is proposed to maximize both effective load carrying capability (ELCC) and economic revenue of the hybrid system. An improved normal boundary intersection (NBI) method is proposed to solve the multi-objective problem and obtain the Pareto surface. Moreover, to ensure the optimality of the results, big-M method, binary expansion method integrated with linearization transformation techniques are employed to linearize the model. Results are presented and discussed in the case study, which verify the feasibility of the model, demonstrate the effectiveness of the improved NBI method and illustrate the significance of involving ELCC into HRES operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据