4.3 Article

The novel index using preoperative C-reactive protein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 26, 期 10, 页码 1922-1928

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01964-2

关键词

Pancreatic cancer; Prognosis; Systemic inflammation; C-reactive protein; Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

类别

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP21K08718, JP21K08805]
  2. Uehara Memorial Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that C-NLR can serve as a prognostic indicator for patients undergoing pancreatic resection, indicating the importance of considering both CRP and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting therapeutic outcomes.
Background Several kinds of systemic inflammatory response, classified into two types: C-reactive protein (CRP)-based type and blood cell count-based type, were reported as a prognostic indicator in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). However, there is no consensus which types is more sensitive predictor in patients with PC. Therefore, we here developed a novel biomarker, C-NLR, which consists of both CRP and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and we evaluated the prognostic significance of C-NLR in patients with PC after pancreatic resection. Methods A total of 217 patients was comprised in this study. We retrospectively investigated the relation between C-NLR and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after pancreatic resection. Results Optimal cutoff level of C-NLR was defined as 0.206 by a ROC analysis. By multivariate analysis, age (P = 0.024), TNM stage (P < 0.001), and C-NLR (HR: 1.373, 95% CI: 1.005-1.874, P = 0.046) were independent predictors of DFS, whereas TNM stage (P = 0.016) and C-NLR (HR: 1.468, 95% CI: 1.042-2.067, P = 0.028) were independent predictors of OS. Conclusion Preoperative C-NLR can be a prognostic indicator in patients with PC after pancreatic resection, suggesting the importance of both CRP and blood cell count in predicting therapeutic outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据