4.7 Article

To what extent is male excess risk of advanced colorectal neoplasms explained by known risk factors? Results from a large German screening population

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 149, 期 11, 页码 1877-1886

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33742

关键词

colorectal neoplasia; distal colon; male sex; prevalence; proximal colon

类别

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [01GL1712]
  2. Zentralinstitut fur die kassenarztliche Versorgung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence and prevalence of colorectal cancer and its precursors are higher in males than in females in many countries, but the reasons for this difference are not fully understood. The male excess risk of colorectal cancer is partially explained by medical, lifestyle, and dietary factors, which account for 47% of the risk. The risk of advanced neoplasia increases in males from the proximal colon to the distal colon and rectum, with different proportions of excess risk explained by covariates in different segments of the colon.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and prevalence of its precursors are substantially higher among males than among females in most countries but the reasons for the male excess risk are incompletely understood. We aimed to assess to what extent it is explained by known risk factors. Prevalence of advanced neoplasia (AN, ie, CRC or advanced adenoma) and CRC risk and preventive factors were ascertained among 15 985 participants of screening colonoscopy aged 55-79 years in Germany. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for the association between male sex and AN with and without adjustment for known risk and preventive factors. In age-adjusted comparisons, men had 2-fold increased risk for AN compared to women (OR = 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79-2.19). After comprehensive adjustment for medical, lifestyle and dietary factors, the OR was reduced to 1.52 (95% CI 1.30-1.77), suggesting that these factors accounted for 47% of male excess risk. Male excess risk increased from proximal colon to distal colon and rectum, with age-adjusted ORs (95% CI) of 1.63 (1.38-1.91), 2.13 (1.85-2.45) and 2.36 (1.95-2.85), respectively, and with the proportion of excess risk explained by covariates being lower for AN in the rectum (26%) than for AN in the proximal (52%) or distal colon (46%). Male excess risk was somewhat lower (age-adjusted OR 1.87) and explained excess risk was smaller (36%) when men were compared to women who never used hormone replacement therapy. In conclusion, most of the male excess risk and the potential to overcome it remain to be explored by further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据