4.7 Article

Chitosan/alginate/hyaluronic acid polyelectrolyte composite sponges crosslinked with genipin for wound dressing application

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.044

关键词

Chitosan; Alginate; Polyelectrolyte complexes; Genipin; Wound dressing

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21502139, 81671395]
  2. Shandong First Medical University [2019LJ003, 2019QL011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyelectrolyte complexes wound dressing based on chitosan/alginate/hyaluronic acid crosslinked with genipin were prepared, showing excellent biocompatibility and adjustable physical, mechanical, and biological properties. The dressing promoted wound healing in a rat model and exhibited great potential for use as promising wound dressings.
Wound dressing composed of polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs), based on chitosan/alginate/hyaluronic acid (CS/ ALG/HYA) crosslinked by genipin, was prepared by freeze-dried molding. Genipin as excellent natural biological crosslinker was chose for high biocompatibility and improving mechanical properties of materials. The CS/ALG/ HYA sponges (CAHSs) were characterized by FTIR, XRD, DSC and SEM. Porosity, swelling behavior and mechanical properties and in vitro degradation of CAHSs were investigated. The cytotoxicity assay was carried out on HUVEC cells in vitro and the result proves the good biocompatibility of CAHSs. Hemolysis tests indicated that the prepared CAHSs were non-hemolytic material (hemolysis ratio < 5%, no cytotoxicity). PT and aPPT coagulation tests demonstrated that CAHS2 and CAHS3 could both activate the extrinsic and intrinsic coagulation pathway and thus accelerated blood coagulation. Further, in a rat full-thickness wounds model, the CAHS2 sponge significantly facilitates wound closure compared to other groups. CAHSs exhibited adjustable physical, mechanical and biological properties. Thus, the chitosan-based polyelectrolyte composite sponges exhibit great potential as promising wound dressings. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据