4.7 Article

The basicity of an active-site water molecule discriminates between tyrosinase and catechol oxidase activity

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.206

关键词

Catalytic mechanism; Crystal structure; Tyrosinase

资金

  1. Yasuda Women's University [20K05715]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. KOSE Cosmetology Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that the presence of metallochaperone caddie protein (Cad) enables tyrosinase (Ty) to catalyze the catecholase reaction more effectively than the phenolase reaction. Mutations at the N191 residue can decrease the inherent ratio of phenolase versus catecholase activity. The increased basicity of the water molecule may be necessary for inhibiting the proton transfer in the catalytic cycle.
Tyrosinase (Ty) and catechol oxidase (CO) are members of type-3 copper enzymes. While Ty catalyzes both phenolase and catecholase reactions, CO catalyzes only the latter reaction. In the present study, Ty was found to catalyze the catecholase reaction, but hardly the phenolase reaction in the presence of the metallochaperon called caddie protein (Cad). The ability of the substrates to dissociate the motif shielding the active-site pocket seems to contribute critically to the substrate specificity of Ty. In addition, a mutation at the N191 residue, which forms a hydrogen bond with a water molecule near the active center, decreased the inherent ratio of phenolase versus catecholase activity. Unlike the wild-type complex, reaction intermediates were not observed when the catalytic reaction toward the Y98 residue of Cad was progressed in the crystalline state. The increased basicity of the water molecule may be necessary to inhibit the proton transfer from the conjugate acid to a hydroxide ion bridging the two copper ions. The deprotonation of the substrate hydroxyl by the bridging hydroxide seems to be significant for the efficient catalytic cycle of the phenolase reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据