4.5 Article

A Novel Lightweight Block Encryption Algorithm Based on Combined Chaotic S-Box

期刊

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218127421501522

关键词

Combined chaotic map; S-box; lightweight; block cipher

资金

  1. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2019MF054]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61902091]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT.NSRIF.2020099]
  4. Foundation of Science and Technology on Information Assurance Laboratory [KJ-17-004]
  5. Weihai University Co-construction Project
  6. Engineering Technology and Research Center of Weihai Information Security

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a combined chaotic map-based S-box and lightweight block encryption algorithm, showing improved cryptographic performance and meeting the requirements of lightweight algorithms.
Due to high computational cost, traditional encryption algorithms are not suitable for the environments in which resources are limited. In view of the above problem, we first propose a combined chaotic map to increase the chaotic interval and Lyapunov exponent of the existing one-dimensional chaotic maps. Then, an S-box based on the proposed combined chaotic map is constructed. The performances of the designed S-box, such as bijection, nonlinearity, strict avalanche criteria, differential uniformity, the bits independence criterion, and the linear approximation probability, are tested to show that it has better cryptographic performances. Finally, we present a lightweight block encryption algorithm by using the above S-box. The algorithm is based on the generalized Feistel structure and SPN structure. In addtion, the processes of encryption and decryption of our algorithm are almost the same, which reduces the complexity of algorithm implementation. The experimental results show that the proposed encryption algorithm meets the requirements of lightweight algorithms and has good cryptographic characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据