4.6 Article

An improved numerical integration method to predict the milling stability based on the Lagrange interpolation scheme

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07311-z

关键词

Milling stability; Numerical integration method; Lagrange interpolation scheme; Convergence rate; Stability lobe diagram

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51975336]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province [2019JZZY010112]
  3. Key Basic Research Project of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018ZB0106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An improved numerical integration method is proposed for predicting milling stability by dividing the milling dynamic model into free and forced vibration stages and constructing an efficient and accurate state transition matrix. Experimental results show that this method outperforms existing methods in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency.
To predict the milling stability accurately and efficiently, an improved numerical integration method (INIM) is proposed based on the Lagrange interpolation scheme. First, the milling dynamic model considering the regenerative chatter can be described as a delay linear differential equation. The tooth passing period of the milling cutter is divided into the free and forced vibration stages. Then, the forced vibration stage is equally discretized, and the INIMs are built based on the Lagrange interpolation scheme within the discretized intervals to construct the state transition matrix. Finally, the convergence rates and the stability lobes for the benchmark milling systems are calculated and discussed by using the proposed INIMs and the existing methods, respectively. The comparison results reveal that the proposed second-order INIM shows higher computational efficiency and accuracy compared with the related discretization methods, and in the meantime, it is more accurate under just slightly loss of the time cost compared with the existing NIMs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据