4.4 Article

Characterization of different aroma-types of chinese liquors based on their aroma profile by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and sensory evaluation

期刊

FLAVOUR AND FRAGRANCE JOURNAL
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 217-227

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ffj.3304

关键词

Chinese liquor; SBSE; GC-MS; volatile compounds; PLSR

资金

  1. National Youth Science Foundation of China [21306114]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [2147614090]
  3. National Key Technology RD Program [2011BAD23B01]
  4. Shanghai Engineering Technology Research Center of Fragrance and Flavor [15DZ2280100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aroma profile of different aroma-types of Chinese liquors was measured using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and sensory evaluation. Sensory analysis coupled with principal component analysis (PCA) showed that strong-aroma liquors were mainly characterized by cellar aroma; light-aroma liquors were mainly characterized by fen, floral, grain, sweet and vinegar aromas while sauce-aroma liquors were mainly characterized by sauce, fruity and caramel aromas. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) results indicated that ethyl hexanoate, hexanoic acid, hexyl hexanoate, 4-methyl pheno, ethyl pentanoate, isoamyl hexanoate and pentanoic acid were significantly and positively associated with cellar aroma and strong-aroma liquors. Vinegar and fen aroma were strongly linked with light-aroma liquor and associated with of ethyl acetate, 2-methylpropyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, isoamyl lactate, ethyl decanoate, diethyl butanedioate, 2-phenethyl acetate, 3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one 1-dodecanol, ethyl decanoate, 3-methyl-1-butanol and thymol. While sauce-aroma liquors were positively correlated with caramel, fruity and sauce sensory descriptors and volatile compounds such as ethyl 2-methylpropanoate, ethyl 3-methylbutanoate, furfural, 1,3-dimethyl trisulfide, trimethyl pyrazine, ethyl benzeneacetate, benzaldehyde and 1-octanol. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据