4.7 Article

Natural convection and entropy generation of Ag-water nanofluid in a finned horizontal annulus: A particular focus on the impact of fin numbers

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105349

关键词

Entropy generation; Fin; Horizontal annulus; Biological nanofluid; Natural convection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that adding fins and increasing the volume fraction in the biological Ag-water nanofluid in a horizontal annulus significantly improve the Nu, while also increasing the thermal and frictional entropy generation rates. The impact of entropy generation varies depending on different conditions.
In this work, numerical investigation of the natural convection and entropy generation characteristics of biological Ag-water nanofluid in a horizontal annulus having fins attached to the inner cylinder is aimed. The impacts of nanoparticle volume concentration (phi = 0, 0.1, 0.5 and 1%), Rayleigh number (Ra = 10(3), 10(4) and 10(5)), and number of fins (n = 0, 2, 4 and 8) on the flow structure, temperature distribution, average Nusselt number (Nu) as well as on the thermal, frictional and total entropy generation rates are examined comprehensively. The computational outcomes indicate that the fin attachment and the increment of its number significantly improve Nu up to 35.50%, while the entropy generation rate sourced by heat transfer significantly increases up to 39.07% accordingly, compared to the finless annulus. The frictional entropy generation is remarkably decreased at low Ra by the increment of the number of fins, nevertheless, it is notably increased at high Ra. Besides, the inclusion of nanoparticles significantly contributes to the augmentation of Nu, being attained up to around 30% with a volume fraction of phi = 1%, whereas it significantly increases both thermal and frictional entropy generation rates, which can respectively reach up to 30.25 and 77.60% at the same volume fraction in the finless annulus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据