4.7 Article

Proton-Coupled Group Transfer Enables Concerted Protonation Pathways Relevant to Small-Molecule Activation

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 60, 期 22, 页码 16953-16965

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01609

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By electrochemically activating an organometallic Ruthenium(II) complex in acetonitrile solutions, the movement of protons from weak Brønsted acids to carbon dioxide (CO2) was coupled with the generation of a metal-hydride complex and a carbonate species, providing key intermediates for CO2 and proton reduction catalysis. These pathways may offer alternative approaches in electrosynthesis of chemical commodities through alkylation and carboxylation reactions.
The mechanistic identification of Nature's use of concerted reactions, in which all bond breaking and bond making occurs in a single step, has inspired rational designs for artificial synthetic transformations via pathways that bypass high-energy intermediates that would otherwise be thermodynamically and kinetically inaccessible. In this contribution we electrochemically activate an organometallic Ruthenium(II) complex to show that, in acetonitrile solutions, the movement of protons from weak Bronsted acids, such as water and methanol, is coupled with the transfer of its negatively charged counterpart to carbon dioxide (CO2)-a process termed proton-coupled group transfer-to stoichiometrically produce a metal-hydride complex and a carbonate species. These previously unidentified pathways have played key roles in CO2 and proton reduction catalysis by enabling the generation of key intermediates such as hydrides and metallocarboxylic acids, while their applicability to carbon acids may provide alternative approaches in the electrosynthesis of chemical commodities via alkylation and carboxylation reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据