4.7 Article

Electrochemical Degradation of a Dicationic Rhenium Complex via Hoffman-Type Elimination

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 60, 期 17, 页码 13011-13020

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01427

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Chemistry
  2. Johns Hopkins University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a new dicationic rhenium bipyridyl complex capable of multielectron ligand-centered reductions. The research reveals an unusual reductively induced Hoffman-type elimination mechanism during electrolysis, identifying electrolytically susceptible groups and proposing key intermediates in the degradative pathway. The investigation highlights the complex interplay between the ligand and metal ion, providing insights for the future design of metal-organic catalysts.
Electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) by transition-metal catalysts is an attractive means for storing renewably sourced electricity in chemical bonds. Metal coordination compounds represent highly tunable platforms ideal for studying the fundamental stepwise transformations of CO2 into its reduced products. However, metal complexes can decompose upon extended electrolysis and form chemically distinct molecular species or, in some cases, catalytically active electrode deposits. Deciphering the degradative pathways is important for understanding the nature of the active catalyst and designing robust metal complexes for small-molecule activation. Herein, we present a new dicationic rhenium bipyridyl complex capable of multielectron ligand-centered reductions electrochemically. Our in-depth experimental and computational study provides mechanistic insight into an unusual reductively induced Hoffman-type elimination. We identify benzylic tertiary ammonium groups as an electrolytically susceptible moiety and propose key intermediates in the degradative pathway. This investigation highlights the complex interplay between the ligand and metal ion and will guide the future design of metal-organic catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据