4.5 Article

Repurposing Methotrexate in Dampening SARS-CoV2-S1-Mediated IL6 Expression: Lessons Learnt from Lung Cancer

期刊

INFLAMMATION
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 172-179

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10753-021-01536-6

关键词

COVID-19; ACE2; IL-6; Folate-binding protein; Methotrexate

资金

  1. NBRC core funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with uncontrolled inflammation and loss of ACE2 function, similar to characteristics seen in lung cancer. Analysis showed an inverse correlation between ACE2 and IL6 in lung adenocarcinoma, and treatment with MTx dampened the inflammatory response while restoring ACE2 expression in CoV-2-SRBD transfected cells. Repurposing MTx as a therapy against inflammation regulators in SARS-CoV-2 infection is worthy of investigation.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (COVID-19) is associated with uncontrolled inflammatory responses. Loss of pulmonary angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) function has been associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aberrant signalling and dysregulated inflammation characteristic of lung cancer have marked similarities with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Spearman's correlation analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets indicated an inverse correlation between ACE2 and IL6 in lung adenocarcinoma. qRT-PCR analysis revealed CoV-2-SRBD-mediated diminished ACE2 expression in lung cancer cells that was concomitant with increased IL6 expression. Western blot and qRT-PCR analysis suggested that treatment with methotrexate (MTx) dampened CoV-2-SRBD-mediated increase in JAK1/STAT3 phosphorylation, gp130, IL6, and folate-binding protein (FBP) expressions. MTx also rescued the diminished expression of ACE2 in CoV-2-SRBD transfected cells. As lung tissue injury in severely affected COVID-19 patients is characterised by aberrant inflammatory response, repurposing MTx as an effective therapy against critical regulators of inflammation in SARS-CoV-2 infection warrants investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据