4.4 Article

Genetic diversity of Parechovirus A in infants and children with acute gastroenteritis in Japan during 2016?2018

期刊

INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104776

关键词

PeV-A; Genotype; Children; Acute gastroenteritis; Japan

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [16H05360]
  2. Public Foundation of the Vaccination Research Center [2018-38, 2019-41]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed a high genetic diversity of PeV-A circulating in Japanese infants and children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE), with five different genotypes detected including the rare PeV-A2. Clinical symptoms observed in these patients included diarrhea, vomiting, fever, cough, rhinorrhea, and dehydration.
Parechovirus A (PeV-A), previously known as human parechovirus, is a common pathogen in children that can cause respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases as well as severe neurological disease. Take advantage of our previous findings on the genetic diversity of PeV-A circulating in Japanese children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE), this study was conducted to investigate the genetic diversity of PeV-A isolated from children with AGE in Japan as well as their clinical symptoms. Of 1070 stool samples collected from Japanese infants and children with AGE during the 2-year period from July 2016 to June 2018, 76 were positive for PeV-A by multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and were subjected to genotyping based on viral protein 1 (VP1) sequences. Five different PeV-A genotypes including PeV-A1B, -A2, -A3, -A4, and -A6 were detected with predominant of PeV-A1 clade B genotype. This study revealed a high genetic diversity of PeV-A circulating in Japanese infants and children with AGE and the PeV-A2, a rare genotype, was detected for the first time in Japan in patients with AGE. The clinical symptoms observed in these patients included diarrhea, vomiting, fever, cough, rhinorrhea, and dehydration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据