4.6 Article

Bacterial infections in critically ill patients with SARS-2-COVID-19 infection: results of a prospective observational multicenter study

期刊

INFECTION
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 139-148

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-021-01661-2

关键词

COVID-19; Critically ill patients; Secondary bacterial infection; Co-infection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In critically ill patients infected with COVID-19, the incidence of bacterial infections is high and associated with worse outcomes. Regular microbiological surveillance and strict infection control measures are crucial.
Purpose To investigate the prevalence, incidence and characteristics of bacterial infections and their impact on outcome in critically ill patients infected with COVID-19. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study in eight Italian ICUs from February to May 2020; data were collected through an interactive electronic database. Kaplan-Meier analysis (limit product method) was used to identify the occurrence of infections and risk of acquisition. Results During the study period 248 patients were recruited in the eight participating ICUs. Ninety (36.3%) patients developed at least one episode of secondary infection. An ICU length of stay between 7 and 14 days was characterized by a higher occurrence of infectious complications, with ventilator-associated pneumonia being the most frequent. At least one course of antibiotic therapy was given to 161 (64.9%) patients. Overall ICU and hospital mortality were 33.9% and 42.9%, respectively. Patients developing bacteremia had a higher risk of ICU mortality [45.9% vs. 31.6%, odds ratio 1.8 (95% CI 0.9-3.7), p = 0.069] and hospital mortality [56.8% vs. 40.3%, odds ratio 1.9 (95% CI 1.1-3.9), p = 0.04]. Conclusion In critically ill patients infected with COVID-19 the incidence of bacterial infections is high and associated with worse outcomes. Regular microbiological surveillance and strict infection control measures are mandated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据