4.6 Article

Non-invasive ventilation versus mechanical ventilation in hypoxemic patients with COVID-19

期刊

INFECTION
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 989-997

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-021-01633-6

关键词

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Non-invasive ventilation; Mechanical ventilation; Critical care outcomes

资金

  1. Medical Scientist Training Program Training Grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [T32GM007280]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH [R35GM124836]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the NIH [R01HL155915, R01HL139865]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NIV was associated with lower mortality and morbidity during respiratory intervention among hypoxemic patients with COVID-19 as compared to MV. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the role of NIV in this patient population.
Purpose Limited mechanical ventilators (MV) during the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic have led to the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in hypoxemic patients, which has not been studied well. We aimed to assess the association of NIV versus MV with mortality and morbidity during respiratory intervention among hypoxemic patients admitted with COVID-19. Methods We performed a retrospective multi-center cohort study across 5 hospitals during March-April 2020. Outcomes included mortality, severe COVID-19-related symptoms, time to discharge, and final oxygen saturation (SpO2) at the conclusion of the respiratory intervention. Multivariable regression of outcomes was conducted in all hypoxemic participants, 4 subgroups, and propensity-matched analysis. Results Of 2381 participants with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2, 688 were included in the study who were hypoxemic upon initiation of respiratory intervention. During the study period, 299 participants died (43%), 163 were admitted to the ICU (24%), and 121 experienced severe COVID-19-related symptoms (18%). Participants on MV had increased mortality than those on NIV (128/154 [83%] versus 171/534 [32%], OR = 30, 95% CI 16-60) with a mean survival of 6 versus 15 days, respectively. The MV group experienced more severe COVID-19-related symptoms [55/154 (36%) versus 66/534 (12%), OR = 4.3, 95% CI 2.7-6.8], longer time to discharge (mean 17 versus 7.1 days), and lower final SpO2 (92 versus 94%). Across all subgroups and propensity-matched analysis, MV was associated with a greater OR of death than NIV. Conclusions NIV was associated with lower respiratory intervention mortality and morbidity than MV. However, findings may be liable to unmeasured confounding and further study from randomized controlled trials is needed to definitively determine the role of NIV in hypoxemic patients with COVID-19.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据