4.6 Article

Oxidative Reforming of Methane over Rh-Containing Zeolites: Active Species and Role of Zeolite Framework

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 24, 页码 8696-8704

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01353

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP) by Cabinet Office, Government of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comparing Rh ion-exchanged Y zeolite and amorphous silica-alumina, it was found that Rh oxide on Rh-ASA exhibited slightly higher catalytic activity than isolated Rh cations on Rh-Y, but the catalytic lifetime of Rh-Y was longer due to the protection of isolated Rh cations from aggregation by electrostatic interaction with the zeolite framework. Rh-Y also showed high catalytic activity even at low Rh contents thanks to its high dispersibility.
Rh ion-exchanged Y zeolite (Rh-Y) and amorphous silica-alumina (Rh-ASA) were prepared by the ion-exchange method. The Rh species were identified by UV-vis and IR spectroscopies, TEM, and H-2-TPR measurements. Isolated Rh cations were preferentially formed on the Y zeolite, while Rh oxide mainly existed on ASA. The catalytic activities of the prepared samples for oxidative reforming of methane were evaluated. The Rh oxide on Rh-ASA exhibited slightly higher methane conversion and CO yield than those of the isolated Rh cation on Rh-Y. On the other hand, the catalytic lifetime over Rh-Y was longer than that over Rh-ASA because the isolated Rh cations were protected from aggregation by electrostatic interaction with the zeolite framework. In addition, Rh-Y exhibited a high catalytic activity even at low Rh contents owing to its high dispersibility. On the basis of the experimental facts, we have successfully clarified the active Rh species for this oxidative reforming of methane and demonstrated the effectiveness of the zeolite framework for the stabilization of the active species. This article provides the important concept for the design of highly active catalysts in this catalytic system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据