4.6 Review

The special unfolded protein response in plasma cells*

期刊

IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS
卷 303, 期 1, 页码 35-51

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imr.13012

关键词

anticipatory unfolded protein response; autophagy; expansion of secretory apparatus; inactivation of sensors

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG-063029, AI-139123]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PC rely on the unfolded protein response (UPR) to cope with the high rate of antibody production, utilizing a specialized UPR program that integrates with other pathways essential for cell function. This unique UPR scheme in PC is finely tuned to meet the specific demands of different developmental stages and is not shared with other secretory cells.
The high rate of antibody production places considerable metabolic and folding stress on plasma cells (PC). Not surprisingly, they rely on the unfolded protein response (UPR), a universal signaling, and transcriptional network that monitors the health of the secretory pathway and mounts cellular responses to stress. Typically, the UPR utilizes three distinct stress sensors in the ER membrane, each regulating a subset of targets to re-establish homeostasis. PC use a specialized UPR scheme-they preemptively trigger the UPR via developmental signals and suppress two of the sensors, PERK and ATF6, relying on IRE1 alone. The specialized PC UPR program is tuned to the specific needs at every stage of development-from early biogenesis of secretory apparatus, to massive immunoglobulin expression later. Furthermore, the UPR in PC integrates with other pathways essential in a highly secretory cell-mTOR pathway that ensures efficient synthesis, autophagosomes that recycle components of the synthetic machinery, and apoptotic signaling that controls cell fate in the face of excessive folding stress. This specialized PC program is not shared with other secretory cells, for reasons yet to be defined. In this review, we give a perspective into how and why PC need such a unique UPR program.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据