4.8 Article

Temporal maturation of neutralizing antibodies in COVID-19 convalescent individuals improves potency and breadth to circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants

期刊

IMMUNITY
卷 54, 期 8, 页码 1841-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.06.015

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [JP19fk0108104, JP20fk0108104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 decrease over time, but the neutralizing potency against the original virus and variants actually improves with time. Late convalescent antibodies show increased neutralization potency against variants, suggesting that antibody response maturation enhances cross-neutralizing ability against circulating variants. This indicates that declining antibody titers may not necessarily mean declining protection.
Antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 slowly wane over time. Here, we examined how time affects antibody potency. To assess the impact of antibody maturation on durable neutralizing activity against original SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants of concern (VOCs), we analyzed receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific IgG antibodies in convalescent plasma taken 1-10 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Longitudinal evaluation of total RBD IgG and neutralizing antibody revealed declining total antibody titers but improved neutralization potency per antibody to original SARS-CoV-2, indicative of antibody response maturation. Neutralization assays with authentic viruses revealed that early antibodies capable of neutralizing original SARS-CoV-2 had limited reactivity toward B.1.351 (501Y.V2) and P.1 (501Y.V3) variants. Antibodies from late convalescents exhibited increased neutralization potency to VOCs, suggesting persistence of cross-neutralizing antibodies in plasma. Thus, maturation of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 potentiates cross-neutralizing ability to circulating variants, suggesting that declining antibody titers may not be indicative of declining protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据