4.4 Article

INS/GPS Sensor Fusion based on Adaptive Fuzzy EKF with Sensitivity to Disturbances

期刊

IET RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 1535-1549

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1049/rsn2.12144

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the estimation accuracy of integrating the inertial navigation system with the global positioning system (GPS), utilizing adaptive and robust structures to overcome environmental disturbances and noises. By comparing different algorithms, the results demonstrate the superiority of the adaptive fuzzy extended Kalman filter (AFEKF) in terms of lower estimation error and higher robustness against disturbances and outliers.
The estimation accuracy of the inertial navigation system integrated with the global positioning system (GPS) through multiple kinds of Kalman filters (KFs) has been widely considered. Since the classical KFs could not overcome environmental disturbances and noises, adaptive and robust structures are utilised in sensor fusion techniques. Here, different types of adaptive structures have been assumed. The fuzzy inference system benefits the adaption of the measurement covariance matrix, a scale factor employed to tune the process covariance matrix and the Chi-square algorithm to detect and bound the disturbances. The estimation accuracy and robustness of the adaptive fuzzy extended Kalman filter (AFEKF) are compared with the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) and extended Kalman filter (EKF) structure in various scenarios involving position, velocity, attitude, accelerometer and gyroscope bias estimation errors. Likewise, in order to evaluate the AFEKF approach practically, an embedded electronic board is designed involving an ARM microcontroller, an inertial measurement unit sensor, and a GPS receiver, which was installed on a land vehicle. The results demonstrated the superiority of the AFEKF over the UKF and EKF in the case of lower estimation error and higher robustness against disturbances and outliers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据