4.4 Article

Nodal charging demand forecast of EVs considering drivers' psychological bearing ability based on NMC-MCS

期刊

IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 467-478

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/gtd2.12293

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51677151]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel forecast method considering drivers' psychological bearing ability (PBA) is proposed to predict EVs' nodal charging demand, showing that PBA significantly affects charging decisions and spatial-temporal distribution of charging power demand. The impact of drivers' PBA on charging power has a close relation with the initial battery level (IBL) of EVs.
Widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) would significantly increase the electrical load demand in power distribution networks. Most previous studies investigated EV charging demand based on drivers' trip habits, but the impact of psychological bearing ability (PBA) about the range anxiety on EV drivers' charging decision are ignored. Here a novel forecast method considering drivers' PBA for predicting nodal charging demand of EVs is proposed. The charging decision model considering PBA is established based on an improved Richards model, and the spatial-temporal dynamics model is established based on the non-homogeneous Markov chain (NMC) and random trip chain. Meanwhile, the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) is adopted to avoid the disaster of dimensionality in large scale EVs charging problem. The proposed method is illustrated by an actual system integrated traffic network and power grid. The simulation results demonstrate that drivers' PBA will significantly affect the charging decision, then changes the spatial-temporal distribution of charging power demand. The conclusion is that the drivers with lower PBA have a higher charging demand, and the impact of drivers' PBA on charging power has a close relation with the initial battery level (IBL) of EVs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据