4.7 Article

Coordinated Optimal Power Flow for Integrated Active Distribution Network and Virtual Power Plants Using Decentralized Algorithm

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 3541-3551

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3049418

关键词

Generators; Load flow; Manganese; Economics; Reactive power; Convergence; Security; Active distribution network; coordinated optimal power flow; multi-parametric quadratic programming; virtual power plant

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China [5400-201999493A-0-0-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A coordinated optimal power flow (OPF) model is established and an efficient decentralized algorithm is proposed, demonstrating faster convergence and better fuel economy compared to prevailing methods through numerical tests.
With the wide application of distributed energy technology in active distribution networks (ADNs), virtual power plants (VPPs) are introduced as a promising integration and management technology. To coordinate their operation schedule and ensure confidentiality, we establish a coordinated optimal power flow (OPF) model and propose an efficient decentralized algorithm based on multi-parametric quadratic programming and Benders decomposition. In feasible sub-problems, the quadratic exchanging functions are built, which greatly accelerates the convergence process. In infeasible sub-problems, feasible cut sets can be calculated based on benders decomposition. Besides, an effective relaxation method is developed to address the degeneracy problem. To eliminate redundant feasible cut sets, a predetermined feasible region is constructed according to the characteristics of each VPP. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated via numerical tests using two cases of different scales. The results show that the proposed method converges much faster than some prevailing methods. Furthermore, the coordinated OPF has a better fuel economy than the conventional OPF scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据