4.7 Article

A Competitive Scheduling Algorithm for Online Demand Response in Islanded Microgrids

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 3430-3440

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2020.3046144

关键词

Real-time systems; Load modeling; Cost accounting; Scheduling; Power demand; Topology; Microgrids; Online demand response; real-time load scheduling; discrete demand requests; competitive online algorithm; combinatorial optimization; optimal power flow; microgrid

资金

  1. Khalifa University of Science and Technology [CIRA-2019-049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the modeling and algorithm design of real-time load scheduling problems in demand response programs, proposing an effective online algorithm that only considers past and current input information, and deriving a theoretical bound on the competitive ratio of the algorithm.
A routine task faced by Microgrid (MG) operators is to optimally allocate incoming power demand requests while accounting for the underlying power distribution network and the associated constraints. Typically, this has been formulated as an offline optimization problem for day-ahead scheduling, assuming perfect forecasting of the demands. In practice, however, these loads are often requested in an ad-hoc manner and the control decisions are to be computed without any foresight into future inputs. With this in view, the present work contributes to the modeling and algorithmic foundations of real-time load scheduling problem in a demand response (DR) program. We model the problem within an AC Optimal Power Flow (OPF) framework and design an efficient online algorithm that outputs scheduling decisions provided with information on past and present inputs solely. Furthermore, a rigorous theoretical bound on the competitive ratio of the algorithm is derived. Practicality of the proposed approach is corroborated through numerical simulations on two benchmark MG systems against a representative greedy algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据