4.8 Article

Circuit Configuration and Modulation of a Seven-Level Switched-Capacitor Inverter

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 7087-7096

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3036351

关键词

Capacitors; Inverters; Switches; Pulse width modulation; Partial discharges; Discharges (electric); Voltage control; Multilevel inverter; self-balancing; single-source; step-up converter; switched-capacitor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a step-up seven-level inverter suitable for renewable energy applications, featuring sensorless voltage balancing of capacitors and generation of bipolar staircase waveforms. The inverter benefits from regenerative performance and prevents unwanted capacitors overvoltage. Experimental results confirm the performance of the proposed inverter and the validity of its design, reaching a maximum efficiency of 94.3% under specific load conditions.
In this article, a step-up seven-level inverter supplied by a single dc source suitable for renewable energy application is presented. Forming the desired output is realized by charging capacitors and synthesizing them based on a switched-capacitor concept. This structure is praised for the ability of sensorless voltage balancing of the capacitors, reducing control complexity to produce a bipolar staircase waveform. It also benefits from regenerative performance, avoiding unwanted capacitors overvoltage. A phase disposition pulsewidth modulation (PD-PWM) technique is utilized to control the circuit operation. Furthermore, a comparison with other recent topologies reveals that losses, number of semiconductor devices, and gate driver circuits are reduced. Theoretical analysis is verified through a laboratory prototype implementation. Experimental results under various types of loads approve the performance of the proposed inverter and validity of the design. Finally, maximum experimental efficiency of 94.3% (115 V, 250 W load) was reached.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据