4.5 Article

Molecular performance of Prl and Gh/Igf1 axis in the Mediterranean meager, Argyrosomus regius, acclimated to different rearing salinities

期刊

FISH PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 203-216

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10695-016-0280-9

关键词

actb; Argyrosomus regius; Euryhaline; gh; igf1; prl; qPCR; Salinity

资金

  1. Spanish agency of international cooperation (Agencia Espanola de Cooperacion Internacional, AECID) [AP/039755/11]
  2. Egyptian Academy of Scientific Research and Technology [AP/039755/11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aquaculture industry in the Mediterranean region exhibits a growing interest for the Mediterranean meager Argyrosomus regius. Some preliminary works showed a good growth performance of the species in nearly isosmotic salinities. However, the patterns of alteration of prolactin (Prl) as well as growth hormone (Gh)/insulin growth factor-1 (Igf1) axis at the molecular level are not yet described in this species. Therefore, we cloned and sequenced partial cDNAs for pituitary prolactin (prl) and growth hormone (gh), hepatic insulin-like growth factor (igf1), and beta-actin (actb). Expression patterns of these transcripts were tested in juveniles of A. regius acclimated to four different environmental salinities: (1) 5 aEuro degrees (hyposmotic); (2) 12 aEuro degrees (isosmotic); (3) 38 aEuro degrees (hyperosmotic; seawater control); and (4) 55 aEuro degrees (extremely hyperosmotic). All investigated transcripts shared high sequence identities with their counterparts in other perciformes. prl mRNA levels showed inverse pattern with increasing salinities. gh mRNA enhanced significantly in both 12 and 55 aEuro degrees salinity groups in comparison with the control group, while igf1 showed its maximum expression levels under the nearly isosmotic environment. The results indicated clear sensitivity of prl, gh and igf1 to changes in environmental salinity, which can possibly control the euryhalinity capacity of this species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据