4.7 Article

Testing Scenario Library Generation for Connected and Automated Vehicles, Part II: Case Studies

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2020.2988309

关键词

Libraries; Testing; Safety; Frequency measurement; Indexes; Linear programming; Estimation; Connected and automated vehicles; testing scenario library; safety; functionality; reinforcement learning

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Region 5 University Transportation Center: Center for Connected and Automated Transportation (CCAT) of the University of Michigan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Testing scenario library generation (TSLG) is a critical step for CAV development and deployment. This study proposes a general method for TSLG and investigates theoretical properties regarding CAV evaluation. By designing and studying three typical cases, the proposed method is shown to accelerate CAV evaluation with high accuracy, especially when enhanced by reinforcement learning technique.
Testing scenario library generation (TSLG) is a critical step for the development and deployment of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs). In Part I of this study, a general method for TSLG is proposed, and theoretical properties are investigated regarding the accuracy and efficiency of CAV evaluation. This paper aims to provide implementation examples and guidelines, and to enhance the proposed methodology under high-dimensional scenarios. Three typical cases, including cut-in, highway-exit, and car-following, are designed and studied in this paper. For each case, the process of library generation and CAV evaluation is elaborated. To address the challenges brought by high dimensionality, the proposed method is further enhanced by reinforcement learning technique. For all three cases, results show that the proposed method can accelerate the CAV evaluation process by multiple magnitudes with same evaluation accuracy, if compared with the on-road test method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据