4.8 Article

Mining Product Reviews for Needs-Based Product Configurator Design: A Transfer Learning-Based Approach

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 6192-6199

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2020.3043315

关键词

Training; Adaptation models; Mass production; Mass customization; Social networking (online); Transfer learning; Neural networks; Configurator design; deep learning; mass customization; text mining; transfer learning

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grant Council, FDS [UGC/FDS14/E06/18, TII-20-2173]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a needs-based configurator mechanism that leverages online product-review text from social media. It utilizes transfer learning to adjust the source model to the target customer needs-specifications mapping, resulting in improved configurator performance.
Online product configurators, the prevailing toolkits used to realize mass customization, embody an advanced manufacturing strategy that provides customized products with the efficiency of mass production. Essentially, a product configuration system elicits customer needs and maps those needs to product attribute specifications. However, existing configurators require that customers have the necessary domain knowledge to configure their products, which hinders the application of these configurators in current customer-centric product design and manufacturing processes. In this article, we propose a needs-based configurator mechanism that leverages online product-review text from social media. We build a source model that maps product reviews to attribute specifications using a hybrid bidirectional long short-term memory network that incorporates relevant product information at word and character levels. Transfer learning is then deployed to adapt the source model to the target customer needs-specifications mapping. Our experimental results show that the transfer-learning operation significantly improves the configurator performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据