4.8 Article

Fuzzy K-Means Cluster Based Generalized Predictive Control of Ultra Supercritical Power Plant

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 4575-4583

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2020.3020259

关键词

Power generation; Autoregressive processes; Predictive control; Predictive models; Boilers; Data models; Fuzzy k-mean cluster; generalized predictive control (GPC); nonlinear controller; ultra supercritical (USC) power plant

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61833011, 61873335, 62073173]
  2. Outstanding Academic Leader Project of Shanghai Science, and Technology Commission [18XD1401600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a fuzzy k-means cluster based generalized predictive control method for improving boiler combustion efficiency in a 1000 MW ultra supercritical power plant. By constructing a fuzzy k-means cluster network, the nonlinear dynamic process of the system is approximated and a global GPC method is introduced. An example demonstrates the satisfactory performance of the proposed control strategy.
This article proposes a fuzzy k-means cluster based generalized predictive control (GPC) method for a 1000 MW ultra supercritical power plant to improve of the boiler combustion efficiency. First, to fully use the statistic characteristic of the historical data, a fuzzy k-mean cluster network (FKN) is well constructed to derive the local linear models, and the nonlinear dynamic process of studied system is elaborately approximated by the fuzzy combination of the local linear models. Then, a global GPC method is proposed to improve the control performance by using the membership of the current FKN. Different from the traditional GPC, the advantage of proposed GPC is that local GPC is fuzzily combined together to achieve the purpose of global GPC by a scheduling algorithm. Finally, an example illustrates that the proposed control strategy can achieve the satisfactory performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据