4.8 Article

Comprehensive Technology Qualification Process for Subsea Electronics Assemblies

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 68, 期 7, 页码 6358-6368

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2020.2998736

关键词

Testing; Stress; Standards; Reliability; Oils; Natural gas industry; Vibrations; Environmental stresses; experimental validation; technology qualification; technology readiness level

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subsea production systems technologies are steadily developing to address deep-sea environmental issues, with a comprehensive technology qualification program proposed to ensure reliable operation of electrical/electronic systems on the seabed. By conducting environmental stress tests compliant with international standards, such as API, ISO, IEC, and IEEE, technology readiness level of subsea electrical/electronics assembly can be achieved.
Subsea production systems technologies are being developed steadily to address the technological issues associated with the deep-sea environment, primarily pressure, and temperature. To ensure the reliable operation of electrical/electronic systems for at least 25 years on the seabed, a comprehensive technology qualification program is proposed in this article. In relation to this, technology readiness level of the subsea electrical/electronics assembly is achieved after conducting devised environmental stress tests compliant to the internationally recognized standards, e.g., API, ISO, IEC, and IEEE. The comprehensive tests methods of the qualification program are explained to achieve the technology readiness level 3 of the subsea printed circuit board and subassemblies. Finally, experimental test results of a standalone subsea Ethernet switch and also functional verification with 100 m of electrical flying lead undergoing the prescribed test methods show that the subsea electronics comply with the international standards and is fit for use in the subsea environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据