4.6 Article

Characteristics of Pseudospark Discharge in Particle-in-Cell Simulations

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
卷 68, 期 6, 页码 3003-3009

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2021.3073877

关键词

Discharges (electric); Fault location; Integrated circuit modeling; Mathematical model; Cathodes; Anodes; Electron beams; Low press gas discharge; particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation; pseudospark (PS) discharge; self-breakdown

资金

  1. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/S00968X/1, EP/S009582/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/S00968X/1, EP/S009582/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The characteristics of the pseudospark (PS) discharge were studied through particle-in-cell simulations with the consideration of the external circuit. Different discharge stages have different electron sources and densities, with the hollow cathode discharge phase having the most balanced parameters.
In this article, the characteristics of the pseudospark (PS) discharge were studied through particle-in-cell simulations with the consideration of the external circuit. The different discharge stages, including the Townsend discharge, hollow cathode discharge, and super-dense glow, were characterized by the discharge voltage and current. The sources of electrons at different discharge stages were analyzed, with the electrons generated from the ionization of the background gas playing the dominant role. The electron densities at the Townsend discharge, hollow cathode discharge, and super-dense glow discharge stages were in the range of 10(13), 10(18), and 10(20) m(-3), respectively. The energy of the electron beam extracted at the anode aperture at different discharge phases was exported and postprocessed. The electron beams generated at the three stages have an energy spread of 10%, 20%, and 40%, respectively. The hollow cathode discharge phase has balanced parameters in beam energy, energy spread, and electron density in contrast to the Townsend discharge and super-dense glow discharge stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据