4.5 Article

Effect of Relative Humidity on the Surface Electric Field Intensity Characteristics under DC Voltage in a Corona Cage

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TDEI.2021.009483

关键词

Voltage measurement; Surface discharges; Humidity measurement; Humidity; Space charge; Corona; Discharges (electric); corona; space charge; surface electric field; relative humidity

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB209401]
  2. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of relative humidity on the surface electric field (SEF) strength and space charge density, with the results showing a mutual inhibition between the two. After corona occurs, SEF decreases with voltage while charge density increases. A turning point for SEF was observed around 70% humidity.
The effect of relative humidity on the surface electric field (SEF) strength and a new non-contact assessment method based on space charge density were studied. The purpose of using space charge was to assess the SEF accurately, particularly after corona occurs. Space charge measurement and SEF evaluation were conducted at a relative humidity of 40% to 90%. The change law of SEF after corona occurs at different relative humidity was obtained. Results showed that under the same relative humidity, the space charge density increases with the applied voltage, while the SEF decreases with voltages after corona occurs. As the humidity condition aggravated, SEF first increases and then decreases, and the turning point is about 70%. The distribution of charge density has an opposite change trend. The variation of charge density and SEF demonstrates that the two have mutual inhibition. Meanwhile, the change formula of SEF shows that the electric field intensity on the wire surface is not constant after corona occurs. The corona discharge experiment and theoretical research can be further carried out based on the results in this paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据