4.7 Article

Flexible Hybrid Electronics for Monitoring Hypoxia

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBCAS.2021.3087636

关键词

Monitoring; Substrates; Blood; Optical sensors; Photodetectors; Skin; Silicon; Biomedical monitoring; flexible electronics; hypoxia

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB351904]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11625207, 11320101001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a flexible hybrid electronic (FHE) for conveniently monitoring hypoxia with high sensitivity, demonstrating accurate monitoring of arterial blood oxygen saturation (SaO(2)) with an absolute error of less than 2%. The techniques presented in this work have the potential for widespread use in research and clinical applications, particularly in emergency treatment.
Hypoxia refers to insufficient oxygen amounts at the tissue level unable to maintain adequate homeostasis. Severe hypoxia may occur in the absence of subjective breathlessness due to respiratory failure. Precise monitoring of low blood oxygen saturation is crucially desired, catering to the clinical requirements. However, current pulse oximeters cannot function well in monitoring peripheral oxygen saturation limited by the weak peripheral blood circulation at a low oxygen level. In this work, we propose a flexible hybrid electronic (FHE) with a compact structure and high sensitivity for conveniently monitoring hypoxia. This FHE is composed of 10-mu m thickness semiconductors with different materials, functionalities, and sizes. Its performance is demonstrated by monitoring arterial blood oxygen saturation (SaO(2)) at the body's different arteries. The absolute error is less than 2% within a SaO(2) ranging from 99% to 63%. The efficient techniques presented in this work may bring light to the next-generation flexible hybrid electronics and provide potential widespread use in research and clinical applications, especially for emergency treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据