4.7 Article

A Generative Machine Learning-Based Approach for Inverse Design of Multilayer Metasurfaces

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 5725-5739

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2021.3060142

关键词

Deep learning; generative deep learning; generative model; inverse design; machine learning (ML); metasurface; metasurface synthesis; surrogate models

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a machine learning-based approach to automate the design of dual- and triple-layer metasurfaces, solving the difficulties encountered in traditional synthesis methods. This method allows for the synthesis of thin structures with specific scattering properties, applied in various metasurface applications.
The synthesis of a metasurface exhibiting a specific set of desired scattering properties is a time-consuming and resource-demanding process, which conventionally relies on many cycles of full-wave simulations. It requires an experienced designer to choose the number of metallic layers, the scatterer shapes and dimensions, and the type and the thickness of the separating substrates. In this article, we propose a generative machine learning (ML)-based approach to solve this one-to-many mapping and automate the inverse design of dual- and triple-layer metasurfaces. Using this approach, it is possible to solve optimization problems with single or more constraints by synthesizing thin structures composed of potentially brand-new scatterer designs, in cases where the interlayer coupling between the layers is nonnegligible and synthesis by traditional methods becomes cumbersome. Various examples to provide specific magnitude and phase responses of x- and y-polarized scattering coefficients across a frequency range as well as bounded responses for different metasurface applications are presented to verify the practicality of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据