4.7 Article

Equivalent Circuit Models for Metasurfaces Using Floquet Modal Expansion of Surface Current Distributions

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 5691-5703

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2021.3069590

关键词

Manganese; Electronic countermeasures; Load modeling; Current distribution; Integrated circuit modeling; Analytical models; Numerical models; Equivalent circuit models (ECMs); floquet expansions; metasurfaces (MTSs); polarizers; reconfigurable unit cells; reflectarrays (RAs)

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents a fully analytical method for obtaining equivalent circuit models that predict the magnitude and phase of scattering parameters for reflectarray and/or metasurface unit cells. The proposed method is derived from a Floquet modal expansion of surface currents and does not rely on full-wave simulations, providing a fast and efficient design tool.
This work presents a fully analytical method for obtaining equivalent circuit models (ECMs) that predict the magnitude and phase of scattering parameters for reflectarray (RA) and/or metasurface (MTS) unit cells. The proposed ECM is derived from a Floquet modal expansion of surface currents and does not rely on full-wave simulations. Analytical functions are used to represent the current distribution on the unit cell, and the proposed ECM is validated against full-wave simulations for several RA/MTS element types including loaded loops, dogbone and symmetric cross unit cells, and is shown to be accurate under normal and oblique incidence conditions, thus providing a fast and efficient design tool for deriving the scattering parameters of patch-like unit cells in the initial design process. As this approach allows for modeling unit cells loaded using lumped components such as varactor diodes, it can also be used to derive the dynamic response of tunable RA and MTS unit cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据