4.7 Article

A Novel Single Layer Wideband Reflectarray Design Using Two Degrees of Freedom Elements

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
卷 69, 期 8, 页码 5095-5099

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2021.3060098

关键词

Reflector antennas; Phase measurement; Broadband antennas; Reflection; Feeds; Wideband; Antenna measurements; Reflectarray; single-layer; two degrees of freedom (TDF); wideband

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a broadband linearly polarized single-layer reflectarray antenna constructed with spiral-dipole element cells, achieving a linear and smooth phase response by continuously adjusting the two degrees of freedom elements to enlarge the operating bandwidth. Experimental results demonstrate that the antenna has good gain performance and high aperture efficiency at 8 GHz.
A broadband linearly polarized single-layer reflectarray antenna constructed with element cells of spiral-dipoles is presented in this communication. The proposed method achieves the phase change requirements by continuously adjusting the two degrees of freedom (TDF) elements. Then, a linear and smooth phase response covering 360 degrees is obtained by adjusting the TDF. Furthermore, by introducing four rectangular rings around the spiral-dipoles, a relatively slow phase change slope can be obtained and the maximum differences between the achieved phase acquired by element and ideal phase at 6.5 and 9.5 GHz are 20 degrees and 58 degrees, respectively, enlarging the operating bandwidth. A reflectarray prototype with a rectangular aperture of 300 mm in diameter is designed, fabricated, and experimentally verified. The results include a measured gain of 26.5 dBi at 8 GHz with an aperture efficiency of 55%; the 1 dB gain bandwidth can reach 35%. The proposed structure can be extrapolated to higher frequencies due to its single-layer performance. Its benefits include a reduction in manufacturing costs and the mitigation of alignment errors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据