4.7 Article

The GaAs/AIGaAs-Based Extended Gate HEMT Cardiac Troponin-I Biosensor: Design, Mechanism and Clinical Detection

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 17, 页码 18410-18416

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3087716

关键词

Extended gate HEMT biosensor (EG-HEMT); cardiac troponin-I(cTnI); biological regulation ability (delta); clinical detection

资金

  1. Capital Health Research and Development of Special [2020-2-4084]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61874105]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [Y201925]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different structures of EG-HEMT were designed for cTnI detection, with 50y structure showing the highest biological regulation ability and a broader detection range. The biological regulation ability increases with increasing y value, but the growth rate decreases. 30y EG-HEMT performs best in clinical sample detection of cTnI concentration.
Herein, we designed several structures of GaAs/AIGaAs extended gate high electron mobility transistors (EG-HEMT) for cTnI detection, in order to explore the mechanism of bio-detection, the limit of detection (LOD) as well as the application in clinical detection. The experiment carried out that 50y structure of EG-HEMT biosensor, whose extended electrode is 50 times as large as the gate, has highest biological regulation ability (delta). Meanwhile, the concentration range of cTnI detection using 50y EG-HEMT biosensor is about 100 fg ml(-1) to 10 mu g ml(-1), which is much broader than that of Unicel Dx1800 (usually be used in clinical detection). Furthermore, due to the influence of parasitic resistance and other factors, delta increases with the increase of y, but the rising rate of delta decreases at the same time. By comparing the detecting results of clinical samples, 30y EG-HEMT is the best in the detection of cTnI concentration with a relative error of 6%. In a higher concentration range, it is more accurate than that of the Unicel Dx1800, breaking through its limit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据