4.7 Article

Attitude Estimation of SINS on Dynamic Base With Decoupling Gravity Vector

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 18, 页码 20530-20538

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3097161

关键词

Estimation; Gravity; Position measurement; Earth; Gyroscopes; Vehicle dynamics; Sensors; Attitude estimation; strapdown inertial navigation system; decoupling gravity; land vehicle navigation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41804076, 42004067, 41774021, 41871376]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper introduces a new coarse attitude estimation method for a dynamic base with the decoupling of the gravity vector, which does not require the participation of the gravity vector and effectively improves the errors caused by inaccurate gravity vector in SINS attitude estimation.
Accurate and fast estimation of attitude is an important performance criteria for Strapdown Inertial Navigation System (SINS). Although many algorithms for SINS attitude estimation have been proposed by related researchers, most of them take the gravity vector as a known quantity. However, the gravity vector is inaccurate or even unknown in many cases, we have to use normal gravity instead of true gravity, which will bring errors to the mechanics equation of SINS, and reduce accuracy of attitude estimation. The coupling of gravity and attitude has been widely concerned by scholars and lack of effective solutions. In this paper, a new coarse attitude estimation method for dynamic base with decoupling the gravity vector is proposed. The method does not require the participation of gravity vector in attitude estimation process. Numerical simulation based on field test data is employed to verify the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method in land vehicle navigation. The results indicate that the method improved the error caused by inaccurate gravity vector in traditional SINS attitude estimation and it provides a new idea for the measurement of vertical deviation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据