4.7 Article

Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Based on Low-Rank Representation Using Local Outlier Factor

期刊

IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 1279-1283

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2020.2994745

关键词

Anomaly detection; Hyperspectral imaging; Dictionaries; Sparse matrices; Matrix decomposition; Object detection; Anomaly detection; dictionary construction; local outlier factor (LOF); low-rank representation (LRR); matched filter

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61671408]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [6141A02022350, 6141A02022362]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This letter proposes a novel method for hyperspectral anomaly detection based on the LRR model, which improves detection performance by enhancing the dictionary and using an adaptive filter based on LOF.
In recent years, low-rank representation (LRR) has attracted considerable attention in the field of hyperspectral anomaly detection. The main objective of LRR-based methods is to extract anomalies from the complex background. However, the presence of anomalies in the background dictionary can lower the detection performance. In this letter, a novel method is proposed for hyperspectral anomaly detection based on the LRR model. This method facilitates the discrimination between the anomalous targets and background by utilizing a novel dictionary and an adaptive filter based on the local outlier factor (LOF). In order to exclude the potential anomalies from the dictionary, the ranking of LOF scores for each pixel is adapted to select the potential background pixels as dictionary atoms. A filter that explores the intrinsic spatial structure is designed to enhance the differences between the anomalies and the background pixels. The experimental results that conducted on three real-world data sets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves a better performance than several state-of-the-art hyperspectral anomaly detection methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据