4.6 Article

High-k Oxide Field-Plated Vertical (001) β-Ga2O3 Schottky Barrier Diode With Baliga's Figure of Merit Over 1 GW/cm2

期刊

IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS
卷 42, 期 8, 页码 1140-1143

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LED.2021.3089945

关键词

Ga2O3; field plate; high-k; Schottky diode; edge termination; power device; HVPE

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-1931652]
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-21-0078]
  3. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL)/Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) through the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) [FA8650-19-C-2902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By introducing a novel extreme permittivity dielectric field oxide, a vertical (001) beta-Ga2O3 field-plated Schottky barrier diode with high breakdown voltage was successfully fabricated in this study. TCAD simulations show that the surface breakdown electric field of the device reaches as high as 5.45 MV/cm, demonstrating the huge potential of Ga2O3 power devices for multi-kilovolt class applications.
We report a vertical (001) beta-Ga2O3 field-plated (FP) Schottky barrier diode (SBD) with a novel extreme permittivity dielectric field oxide. A thin drift layer of 1.7 mu m was used to enable a punch-through (PT) field profile and very low differential specific on-resistance (Ron-sp) of 0.32 m Omega-cm(2). The extreme permittivity field plate oxide facilitated the lateral spread of the electric field profile beyond the field plate edge and enabled a breakdown voltage (V-br) of 687 V. The edge termination efficiency increases from 13.2 % for non-field plated structure to 61 % for high permittivity field plate structure. The surface breakdown electric field was extracted to be 5.45 MV/cm at the center of the anode region using TCAD simulations. The high permittivity field plated SBD demonstrated a record high Baliga's figure of merit (BFOM) of 1.47 GW/cm(2) showing the potential of Ga2O3 power devices for multi-kilovolt class applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据