4.6 Article

Randomized Low-Rank Approximation Based Massive MIMO CSI Compression

期刊

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 2004-2008

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2021.3065751

关键词

Massive MIMO; channel state information (CSI) feedback; randomized matrix approximation; low rank

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [U1805262]
  2. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of P.R. China Comprehensive Security Defense Platform Project for Industrial/Enterprise Networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel CSI feedback method with low complexity and high precision to accurately recover CSI. The method exploits the low-rank characteristic of a large channel matrix by approximating it with small sub-matrices.
Massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) is regarded as one enabling technique to improve channel capacity and energy/spectrum efficiency of 5G communications. To attain such potential benefits, accurate channel information is critical to the transmitter, which yet remains a challenging task for frequency division duplexing (FDD) systems, i.e., the channel state information (CSI) feedback tends to be resource-demanding especially for massive MIMO communications. In this work, we propose a novel CSI feedback method with low complexity and high precision, which is inspired by randomized matrix approximation. Our approach exploits the inherent low-rank characteristic of a large channel matrix, and approximates it by small sub-matrices which are then reported to transmitter to recover a CSI matrix. Theoretical bounds of the recovered CSI in both error-free and error cases are derived. Simulation results demonstrate our method could recover CSI accurately via an extremely low complexity and yet achieve a largely reduced compression ratio (or feedback overhead), compared to other schemes. It thus has the great potential in the emerging massive MIMO FDD communications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据