4.6 Article

Behaviour in a bottom trawl: moving forward to limit catches of Atlantic cod

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 78, 期 7, 页码 2317-2324

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsab106

关键词

Atlantic cod; bottom trawl; bycatch; fish behaviour; selectivity

资金

  1. NOAA Saltonstall-Kennedy project [NA15NMF4270261]
  2. NOAA Fisheries Service [NA15NMF4070137]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The iconic Atlantic cod has been the focus of substantial fishing-gear research, but understanding of cod behavior during capture in bottom trawls remains limited. Research should focus on directly observing and measuring cod's reactions and sensory capabilities to improve the selectivity of bottom trawls and reduce catches of cod.
The iconic Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua Linnaeus, 1758) has inspired a substantial body of fishing-gear research across its geographical range, with recent efforts predominately to reduce catches of this species in fisheries where their populations are fragile. Despite their iconic status and long history of study compared to other species, our understanding of cod behaviour during the capture process in a bottom trawl remains frustratingly limited. Much of our understanding is derived indirectly through catch results, supported to a limited extent by direct observations of cod in situ or held in laboratories. In this paper, we describe four research challenges and directions that we consider critical to advance our knowledge of cod behaviour, and ultimately, to improve the selectivity of bottom trawls to reduce catches of cod. These include the resurrection of behavioural research to directly observe and measure their reaction and sensory capabilities, and improved interpretation of their behaviour in response to a bottom trawl. It is also our view that progress in limiting catches of cod should emphasize stimulating avoidance in advance or at the mouth of an approaching bottom trawl, rather than retrospectively attempting to do so after they have entered the trawl mouth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据