期刊
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 463-479出版社
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsab146
关键词
adaptation; adaptation option; climate change; fisheries governance; fisheries management; integrated assessment; planned adaptation
资金
- Euro-Marine Network through the CoDReG Foresight Workshop [EM/PFB/2017.006]
- US National Science Foundation [OCE-1323991]
- Norden Top-level Research Initiative sub-programme Effect Studies and Adaptation to Climate Change through the Nordic Centre Centre for Research on Marine Ecosystems and Resources under ClimateChange (NorMER) [36800]
- MARmaED project - European Union [675997]
- European Union [794301]
- Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [675997, 794301] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
The study found that adaptation measures currently focus more on enhancing ecological resilience rather than social resilience in the context of climate change, indicating a greater emphasis on management adaptation. In addition, social adaptation measures are more responsive and used outside the context of climate change, with a lack of centralized planning and organization in the implementation of stakeholder adaptations.
Social-ecological systems dependent on fisheries must be resilient or adapt to remain viable in the face of change. Here, we identified possible interventions (termed adaptation options) from published literature, aimed at supporting social or ecological resilience and/or aiding adaptation to changes induced by environmental or social stressors. Our searches centered on nations/regions across North America, Europe, and the South Pacific, encompassing fisheries literature with and without a climate change focus, to compare how, when, and by whom interventions are currently or potentially implemented. We expected that adaptation options within a climate change context would have a greater focus on enhancing social resilience due to a connection with climate change adaptation assessment methodology. Instead, we found a greater focus on ecological resilience, likely indicating a focus on management adaptation. This pattern, along with the more extensive use of social adaptation options responsively and outside the context of climate change, along with an importance in bottom-up influences in implementing them, suggests a general lack of centralized planning and organization with regards to adaptation of stakeholders. Determining how adaptation options are created, chosen, and implemented is a crucial step within or external to ecosystem-based management, especially if planned stakeholder adaption is the goal.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据