The relationship between external thoracopelvic angle and lumbar segmental axial twist angle using an ultrasound imaging technique

The relationship between externally measured and internal spine axial twist motion (rotation about a vertical axis) is not well understood. Ultrasound is a validated technique for measurement of vertebral axial twist motion and has the potential for measuring segmental vertebral axial twist in vivo. The objective of this study was to evaluate lumbar segmental axial twist in relation to external thoracopelvic twist from optical motion capture using an ultrasound imaging technique. Sixteen participants were tested in a custom-built axial twist jig, which isolated motion to the lumbar spine. Participants were moved from neutral to 75% of maximum axial twist range of motion in an upright kneeling posture. Thoracopelvic motion was recorded with a motion capture system and L1 to S1 vertebral axial twist was recorded using ultrasound. From motion capture, maximum thoracopelvic axial twist motion was 41.1 degrees. From ultrasound, the majority of axial twist motion occurred at the L2-L3 (46.8% of lumbar axial twist motion) and L5-S1 (33.5%) intervertebral joints. Linear regression linking axial twist at each vertebral level to thoracopelvic axial twist ranged from 0.43 to 0.79. These findings demonstrate a mathematical relationship between internal and external axial twist motion and the distribution of motion across the lumbar spine suggests that classic use of L4-L5 to represent lumbar spine motion may not be appropriate for axial twist modelling approaches.

Automated summary

This study investigated the relationship between lumbar segmental axial twist and external thoracopelvic twist using ultrasound and motion capture techniques. The findings suggest a mathematical link between internal and external axial twist motion, with most motion occurring at the L2-L3 and L5-S1 intervertebral joints. The distribution of motion across the lumbar spine indicates that using L4-L5 to represent lumbar spine motion may not be suitable for axial twist modeling approaches.