4.2 Article

Skilled swimmers maintain performance stability under changing attentional focus constraints

期刊

HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2021.102789

关键词

Focus of attention; Motor control; Force production; Dynamic systems theory; Swimming; Expertise

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared the performance of skilled athletes under internal and external attentional focus conditions in swimming dive starts. Results showed no differences in outcome performance between the two conditions, but indicated that external attentional focus led to earlier self-organization of movement events.
Focusing attention externally, rather than internally, has generally proved advantageous as it avoids interfering with self-organzing processes. However, some research has suggested that this may not necessarily be the case with highly skilled individuals who by definition possess a greater capacity to either adapt or maintain stability under varied task constraints. This study aimed to address this gap by comparing the performance of skilled athletes under internal and external attentional focus conditions using the swimming dive start as a task vehicle. Using a counterbalanced repeated measures design, skilled swimmers performed dive starts in conditions of differing attentional focus - internal and external attentional focus. Kinetic and kinematic variables were collected and statistical analyses conducted to compare differences between conditions. The results revealed no differences in outcome performance (relative peak power, horizontal velocity, and time to 5 m) between internal and external focus conditions. However, remaining kinematic and kinetic measures revealed that all movement events occurred earlier in the movement sequence, suggesting superior self-organization of movement in the external focus condition. An external focus may be beneficial for the organization of movement control in skilled swimmers, but may not have an immediate impact upon the outcome of the task.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据