4.3 Article

Fluid Dynamic Gauging for Studying Early Stages of Swelling of Fouling Deposits

期刊

HEAT TRANSFER ENGINEERING
卷 43, 期 15-16, 页码 1378-1386

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01457632.2021.1963549

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cambridge Taiwan Trust PhD scholarship
  2. EPSRC iCASE studentship
  3. Procter Gamble
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new variant of the fluid dynamic gauging technique has been reported for determining the thickness of soft fouling layers in real time, allowing accurate characterization of processes like swelling shortly after a deposit layer contacts a solution. Two applications of the SiDG device have been reported, showing its effectiveness in monitoring thickness change of food soil in cleaning processes and determining properties of deposits on stainless steel substrates in fouling situations. Ageing of fouling resistance and changes in thermal properties and strength of deposit layers during fouling tests have been confirmed by the SiDG device.
A new variant of the fluid dynamic gauging technique for determining the thickness of soft fouling layers in situ and in real time is reported. The sideways fluid dynamic gauging (SiDG) device allows measurements to be made shortly after a deposit layer contacts a solution, allowing processes such as swelling to be characterized accurately. Two applications of the device are reported: (i) in cleaning, monitoring the change of thickness of a complex food soil when it is contacted with aqueous solutions at different temperatures, pH and surfactant content, and (ii) in fouling, in determining the thickness, thermal conductivity and strength of deposits generated from whey protein solutions on heated stainless steel substrates. The evolution of fouling resistance for the whey protein deposits indicates that significant aging takes place during the fouling test, which is confirmed by changes in the thermal properties and strength of the deposit layer as measured by the SiDG device.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据