A Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Between Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Patients Presenting to Townsville Hospital Emergency Department With Chest Pain

Background Indigenous Australians have a high rate of ischaemic heart disease (IHD). There is a paucity of local data for North Queensland regarding the clinical characteristics of Indigenous people who present to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain. The aim of the study is to compare the cardiovascular risk factors, social characteristics, and the clinical outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients who presented with cardiac-related chest pain. Methods This is a retrospective single-centre audit. The data was collected through chart reviews of chest pain presentations to the Townsville University Hospital Emergency Department, Queensland, Australia, from January to December 2017. We categorised the patients into Indigenous and non-Indigenous groups and compared their cardiac risk factors and social characteristics. We further classified the patients into three diagnosis groups and we measured the clinical outcomes in the patients with a diagnosis of cardiac-related chest pain. We used a data linkage to the Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages for the death outcomes. A multivariable analysis was done to determine the risk of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) for Indigenous vs non-Indigenous patients. Results Indigenous patients were over-represented making up 19.1% of the total cohort (compared with 11.1% of the North Queensland Indigenous population) and presented at a younger age (median age: 45 vs 52, p<0.005). Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were significantly higher in Indigenous patients. The incidence of discharge against medical advice was also higher (6.5% vs 2.7%, p<0.005). There was an underutilisation of the local chest pain pathway amongst the Indigenous group (35.8% vs 44.7%, p<0.005). In patients with a diagnosis of cardiac-related chest pain, the rate of receiving invasive coronary angiogram procedures was similar in both cohorts (44.5% vs 43.7%, p=0.836). With regards to outcomes, Indigenous patients suffered from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at a younger median age (51 vs 64, p<0.005) and were more likely to have severe three vessel disease (17% vs 6%, p<0.005) leading to coronary bypass graft surgery (CABG) (19% vs 6%, p<0.005). When adjusted for age, gender, and comorbidities, Indigenous patients were more likely to have MACE within 1 year of their chest pain presentation, compared with non-Indigenous patients with the same diagnosis (adjusted odds ration [AOR]=2.0, 95% CI [1.1, 3.8], p=0.03). Conclusion In our study, Indigenous patients carried a heavier burden of cardiovascular risk factors, presented at a younger age, with more severe coronary disease and had a higher rate of CABG. We found an under utilisation of the local chest pain protocol amongst the Indigenous cohort, which suggests a need to improve support structures in the ED. In our multivariable analysis, Indigenous patients suffered from a significantly higher MACE compared to non-Indigenous patients which indicates that more collaborative efforts are needed to improve the cardiovascular health of local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Automated summary

Indigenous Australians with chest pain present at a younger age and have more severe coronary disease and higher rates of coronary bypass graft surgery. There is a need to improve support structures for Indigenous patients in the emergency department. Indigenous patients have a significantly higher risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) compared to non-Indigenous patients, indicating the need for collaborative efforts to improve cardiovascular health in the local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population.