Fifteen-Year Outcomes Following Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Elderly Patients

Background Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) techniques have several advantages such as preservation of physiological haemodynamics of the native aortic valve and avoidance of prosthetic valve-related complications. However, VSRR procedures are generally performed in young patients and the long-term results in elderly patients (>65 years) are scarce. Methods Fifty-six (56) consecutive patients underwent VSRR surgery by a single surgeon at the current centre between January 2006 and December 2013; a modified remodelling technique was typically performed. The mean age was 58.86 +/- 12.5 years; Marfan syndrome and bicuspid aortic valve were both present in six patients (10.7%); 38 patients (67.8%) presented with greater than moderate aortic regurgitation; and 17 patients (30.4%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III before surgery. They were divided into two groups according to their ages receiving VSRR surgery: Group E (elderly patients aged >= 65 years, n=24) and Group Y (young patients aged <65 years, n=32). The primary outcomes were aortic valve related reoperation, cardiovascular reoperation, all-cause mortality, and functional status. Results One (1) patient in Group E was converted to aortic valve replacement as a result of a failed aortic valve repair. No perioperative mortality was observed. The mean follow-up was 11.5 +/- 2.9 years. Aortic valve-related reoperation was noted in two patients of each group (one with endocarditis, one with severe aortic regurgitation). Cardiovascular reoperations were observed in three and six patients, and all-cause deaths in seven and two patients in Group E and Group Y, respectively. The 10-year freedom from aortic valve-related reoperation was estimated to be 91.7 +/- 5.6% and 92.7 +/- 5.0% (p=0.594), the 10-year freedom from cardiovascular reoperation was 86.4 +/- 7.3% and 81.1 +/- 7.7% (p=0.781), and the cumulative 10-year survival rates were 74.0 +/- 9.2% and 93.8 +/- 4.3% (p=0.018) in Group E and Group Y, respectively. During follow-up, 6.7% of patients were in NYHA class III and 6.4% of patients developed moderate-to -severe aortic regurgitation. Cox regression analysis failed to identify predictors for primary outcomes. Conclusion Valve-sparing aortic root replacement can safely be performed in elderly patients with low early mortality and satisfactory long-term freedom from aortic valve-related and cardiovascular re-intervention.

Automated summary

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement can be safely performed in elderly patients with low early mortality and satisfactory long-term freedom from aortic valve-related and cardiovascular re-intervention. The study found a lower rate of valve-related reoperation and significant differences in prognosis between elderly and young patients, with lower survival rates in elderly patients.